Margaret Sanger Is a Hero to the Left. Here’s Her History of Ugly Views.

Originally published on this site

Margaret Sanger, the women’s rights activist and founder of
Planned Parenthood—the largest abortion provider in America—is a hero to the
modern Left. And little wonder, given her outsized role in the founding and
promotion of the modern abortion industry.

But what few people realize is that Planned Parenthood is
actually more extreme than its founder, at least when it comes to abortion. In
fact, Sanger, as remarkable as it seems, looks positively tame next to the
modern agenda.

Which raises the question: why would Planned Parenthood, which
has gone so far beyond Sanger in its promotion of abortion, eugenics, and
population control, still hold her up as a leader of the movement? Isn’t she a
bit behind the times?

The movement can thank prominent Progressive leaders of the
last decade for raising Sanger’s profile. She’s featured prominently in liberal
speeches and interviews, like when Hillary Clinton told supporters in 2009 that
she was “in awe of her.” In 2014, Barack Obama became the first sitting
president to address the abortion group’s national conference, praising
Sanger’s legacy as its “core principle [that] has guided everything all of you

Interestingly, Planned Parenthood, whose highest award still bears Sanger’s name, has moved so far to the left that its hero probably couldn’t even get a job selling T-shirts for the radical abortion giant today. If they were consistent, modern leftists would call Sanger a white supremacist or an extremist for her views on immigration, race—and yes, abortion.

Take, for example, Sanger’s desire to see America’s borders
sealed to all “unfit” immigrants to protect what she considered a fragile gene pool.
That sounds a lot like the caricature of pro-Trump conservatives conjured up in
left-wing fantasies.

Then there was her notorious speech before a branch of the
New Jersey Ku Klux Klan, a well-documented event despite the content being
nearly forgotten. In that speech, Sanger warned that America must “keep the
doors of Immigration closed” to genetic undesirables.

Then there’s Sanger’s opinion of non-whites, which, if uttered
now, would (rightly) cause a conniption among Americans. She considered
Australia’s Aborigines compulsive
and “the lowest known species of the human family, just a step
higher than the chimpanzee in brain development.” Because he has “no great
brain development,” Sanger wrote, “police authority alone prevents [Aborigines]
from obtaining sexual satisfaction on the streets.”

But if Planned Parenthood was honest about its founder,
Sanger’s most unforgivable “sin” would be her skepticism of abortion itself.

One of Sanger’s few criticisms of the Soviet Union when she
visited the communist state in 1934 was its outright insistence on encouraging
abortion over contraception. “Four hundred thousand abortions a year indicate
women do not want to have so many children,” a perplexed Sanger told a Soviet

She thought that access to birth control was a “human right”—but
was repulsed by abortion. “In my opinion it is a cruel method of dealing with
the problem,” Sanger wrote upon returning home, “because abortion, no matter
how well done, is a terrific nervous strain and an exhausting physical hardship.”

In fact, the founder of Planned Parenthood was deeply
concerned about the “tremendous number of abortions” taking place in the Soviet
Union, as historian Paul Kengor has documented.
Legalization of abortion was one of the communist government’s first acts following
the 1917 Russian Revolution—nearly 60 years before Roe v. Wadeaccomplished the same thing in America. By
1920, the Soviet Union was providing abortions free of charge to its citizens.

Sanger wrote that the number of abortions in Moscow was 100,000
per year. By the 1970s, there were 7–8 million
abortions annually in the USSR—“a rate unmatched in human history,” Kengor
points out. Roe v. Wade only managed 1.5 million in 1973, the year the Supreme
Court legalized abortion.

By these metrics, Planned Parenthood’s position on abortion in
2020 is far closer to that of post-Revolutionary Soviet Union than their hero, Margaret

If Progressives held Sanger to their own standards, they’d
have to denounce her antiquated views—so why do they continue to applaud her?
Because the Left believes that Sanger’s contributions to the pro-choice
movement outweigh her racist views. So Planned Parenthood sticks with its
despicable founder, refusing to disavow her altogether, to its shame.

If leftists were honest, they’d renounce Margaret Sanger—and
then reflect on what it means that they’ve become even more radical than the
eugenicist who started their anti-life movement.

The post Margaret Sanger Is a Hero to the Left. Here’s Her History of Ugly Views. appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Originally posted at


Send this to a friend